The impact of education technology on students’ engagement and writing skills in higher education: A thematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v6i1.781Keywords:
AI in education, digital learning, student engagement, writing skillsAbstract
Education technologies influence the extent and type of student engagement in varying behaviors, learning engagement, and writing development, although the available research is limited. The cognitive, emotional, and ethical implications surrounding technology remain under-researched, despite the increasing volume of recent studies in higher education on this topic. This study examined the impact of digital learning settings and technology on how post-secondary educators enhance their students' engagement and writing skills. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns in the data and to analyze it. A thematic review approach was employed with 59 peer-reviewed studies published between 2004 and 2025. The analysis of studies used a systematic inclusion/exclusion approach to research the dimensions of engagement (e.g., behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social) and the role of technology. The study found that AI instructors, as well as collaborative platforms and widgets (e.g., multimedia), support cognitive and behavioral engagement. Grammarly and Google Docs foster metacognition, peer collaboration, and real-time feedback. However, some believe that excessive reliance on AI and digital distractions could inhibit creativity and critical thinking. Finally, technology affords personalized and interactive learning; therefore, it must be thoughtfully and ethically implemented, as this study suggests. Future studies should pay detailed attention to the longer-term impact of utilizing socially productive educational technology, educator preparedness, and equitable access for all students.
References
Abubakar, U. (2025). The influence of technology-integrated curriculum resources on student engagement and academic achievement in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.014
Ahmed, S., Shehata, M., & Hassanien, M. (2020). Emerging faculty need to enhance student engagement on a virtual platform. MedEdPublish, 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000075.1
Akintayo, O. T., Eden, C. A., Ayeni, O. O., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector; A systematic review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(5), 1395-1422.https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026
Alam, S., & Hasan, M. M. (2025). The role of teaching practicum and classroom management training in preparing early-career educators in Bangladesh: A reflective qualitative study. English Education Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 18(1), 11–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/btdgdh96
Al Zaidy, A. (2024). The impact of generative AI on student engagement and ethics in higher education. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 12(1), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2024.v1.i1.004
Ali, A., Nguyen, T.-T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The application of digital technology and the learning characteristics of Generation Z in higher education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05991. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05991
Anderson, P. (2021). Cognitive engagement in online discussion forums. Higher Education Research, 33(2), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6853149
Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2015). Using Socrative and Smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.01276. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1501.01276
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Brown, T. (2021). The role of digital tools in fostering student participation. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 112-125.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116844
Brown, K., & Clark, H. H. (2006). Context and common ground. Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language and linguistics, 85-87. https://shorturl.at/7ZBPx
Carstens, K. J., Mallon, J. M., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(1), 105-113. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1290791
Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Clare High School graduate CTE success story. (2025, February 22). Midland Daily News.https://www.ourmidland.com/news/article/clare-high-school-graduate-
Dakka, S. M. (2015). Using Socrative to Enhance In-Class Student Engagement and Collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.02500. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1510.02500
Davis, L. (2020). The flipped classroom model and student engagement. Journal of Innovative Teaching, 15(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11226a
Dita, K. I., Tuririday, H. T., Damopolii, I., & Latjompoh, M. (2023). Designing the human circulatory system e-module to increase student achievement. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 3(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v3i2.422
Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Durgungoz, A. (2025). Teacher as a YouTuber: Investigating teacher-generated asynchronous videos, student engagement, and the teacher-student relationship. Journal of Online Learning Research, 11(3), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i15.31875
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on the development of student engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239‑021‑00289‑4
Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2018). The effects of a flipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12553
Fütterer, T., Kerres, M., & Görtz, M. (2022). Quality of technology integration matters; Positive associations with student's behavioral engagement and digital competencies for learning. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13118-8
Garshi, A., Jakobsen, M. W., Nyborg-Christensen, J., Ostnes, D., & Ovchinnikova, M. (2020). Smart technology in the classroom: A systematic review. Prospects for algorithmic accountability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.06374. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.06374
Glickman, E. (2025, February 20). Point & counterpoint;Classroom cell phones are distractions,tools,Journal-Courier. https://rb.gy/i81wp6
Harris, S. (2022). AI tutoring systems and student retention. Learning Technologies Review, 28(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108301
Hasan, M. M., Sikder, A., & Mahmud, R. (2025). Factors influencing Bangladeshi English teachers’ perceptions of academic policy, academic culture and knowledge related to plagiarism in higher education. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 47, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.47.02
Hasan, M. M., Yesmin, M. M., & Hossain, M. K. (2024). Effects of English Medium Instruction (EMI) on students’ academic and speaking performance: comparison between English major and non-English departments. Ilha do Desterro, Vol. 77, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2024.e100248
Hasan, M. M., Al Younus, M. A., Ibrahim, F., Islam, M., & Islam, M. M. (2020). Effects of new media on English language learning motivation at tertiary level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(5), 17-24. https://www.aiac.org.au/journals/index.php/alls/article/view/6430/4496
Hasan, M. M., Khanom, S., & Fatema, K., Rumman, A. M., (2024). Blended Supervision of Theses: Lessons and Future Directions from COVID-19 and Post-Pandemic Situation. Crossings: A Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.59817/cjes.v15i1.572
Hasan, M. M., & Rahman, M. A. (2017). Impacts of Language Lab in Transforming Traditional Learners into Autonomous Learners. Dhaka International University Journal, 9(2). https://api.diu.ac//images/diuac/publication/1632830962_kaxIAEPVqd.pdf
Hasan, M. M., and Ibrahim, F. (2017). Effects of Blog, Wiki, and Google Docs in Learning English Language: A Study of Bangladesh at Tertiary Level. Research Journal (IUKLRJ) 5 (1): 39–49. https://iukl.edu.my/rmc/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/2019/01/B5_IUKLRJ17_Full-1.pdf.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. https://rb.gy/ek0c89
Ho, P. V. P., Phung, L. T. K., Oanh, T. T. T., & Giao, N. Q. (2020). Should peer E-comments replace traditional peer comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
Islam, M., Hasan, M. M., & Mahmud, R. (2024). EFL teachers' perceptions of AI's impact on academic integrity and pedagogy in Bangladeshi universities. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 8(2), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i2.10082
Jack, E., Alexander, C., & Jones, E. M. (2024). Levelling Up Learning: Exploring the Impact of Gamification in Flipped Classrooms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18313. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.18313
Johnson, R. (2019). Mobile learning and student motivation: A case study. International Journal of E-Learning, 12(4), 76-89. https://rb.gy/leqk0n
Khan, A. L., Hasan, M. M., Islam, M. N., & Udin, M. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence tools in developing English writing skills; Bangladeshi university EFL student's perceptions. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 17(2), 345-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v17i2.24369
Kurniawan, R. P., Damopolii, I., & Sirait, S. H. K. (2021). The correlation between biology teacher learning strategies during the Covid-19 pandemic on student motivation. AECON, 299–305.
Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
Lu, H. (2025, February 25). AI does not shortchange learning. It enhances it. San Francisco Chronicle. https://rb.gy/u9ciak
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., & Cheong, C. M. (2021). Understanding the difference between self-feedback and peer feedback: a comparative study of their effects on undergraduate student's writing improvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 739962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Moore, D. (2021). Augmented reality in science education: A tool for engagement. Science Education Research, 31(1), 72-86. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1300883.pdf
Mustofa, A., Hayuana, W., Damopolii, I., Ibrohim, I., & Susilo, H. (2024). The discovery learning and Google sites: Its application in learning the process of urine formation for high school students. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 4(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v4i2.711
Olaya, M., & Mora, W. (2022). Exploring autonomous language learning behaviors through video sharing and online discussions in higher education. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.17827
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing and reflective thinking; Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020914554. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Ramírez Balderas, I., & Guillén Cuamatzi, P. M. (2018). Self and peer correction to improve college student's writing skills. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 20(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.67095
Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL student's writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Salhab, R. (2025). University student's engagement in mobile learning: The impact on attitudes towards learning in an educational technology course. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010016
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Silfani, A. N., Basikin, B., & Hasan, M. M. (2025). The Teachers’ Strategies to Enhance Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Entity: English Teaching and Commonality, 1(1), 1-10. https://journal.pradanainstitute.id/index.php/entity/article/view/3
Smith, J. (2020). Gamification and active learning in STEM education. Educational Review, 45(2), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.5678/edr.2020.98
Uddin, M. S., Islam, M. N., Nirjon, M. I. H., Hilaly, M. R., Mazed, M. F. H., & Hasan, M. M. (2024). University EFL Teachers’ Perceptions About the Effectiveness of AI-Enhanced E-Assessments in Bangladesh: A Phenomenological Study. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 9(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.31559/BAES2024.9.2.4
Wakefield, C., Adie, J., Pitt, E., & Owens, T. (2014). Feeding forward from summative assessment: The essay feedback checklist as a learning tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.822845
Wang, J., Hu, X., Zhang, H., & Ren, Y. (2022). The impact of instructional quality and technology use on student's engagement: A multilevel analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 1501-1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10112-0
Williams, M. (2022). Virtual reality in experiential learning: Enhancing student engagement. Technology and Learning, 29(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.2345/tl.2022.55
Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of COVID-19. Irish educational studies, 40(2), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559
Yang, Y. F. (2018). New language knowledge construction through indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1414852
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to student's writing motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL context: A large-scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on student's learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 1303-1331.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10099-8
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanjida Alam Orpa, Md. Arfan Khan Sohan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
