Improving students’ digital literacy in biology learning through a RICOSRE-based digital module

Ilzha Akbar Muharomi Wicaksono; Susriyati Mahanal; Frida Kunti Setiowati

doi:10.30862/jri.v6i1.22

Authors

Ilzha Akbar Muharomi Wicaksono Universitas Negeri Malang Author
Susriyati Mahanal Universitas Negeri Malang Author
Frida Kunti Setiowati Universitas Negeri Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v6i1.22

Keywords:

Digital literacy, digital module, Google sites, RICOSRE, scientific information

Abstract

Digital literacy is essential in biology learning as students increasingly use digital sources to access scientific information. However, many students still struggle to evaluate online information, while digital platforms often emphasize content delivery rather than digital literacy development. This study examined the effectiveness of a Google Sites-based digital module integrated with RICOSRE in improving students’ digital literacy. This study employed a quasi-experimental method by comparing two intact groups through pretest and posttest procedures. The participants involved 70 students: 34 in the experimental group and 36 in the control group. Data were collected through a test instrument that had been validated and developed with reference to Greenstein’s framework, covering information finding, use of multiple sources, information selection, information evaluation, source and message consideration, and production of original work. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA, N-gain, and effect size. The analysis revealed a significant difference in digital literacy scores, with the experimental group outperforming the control group after controlling for pretest scores, F = 128.008, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.656. The N-gain score was also higher in the experimental group, 0.57 versus 0.28. These findings indicate that the module effectively strengthens students’ digital literacy in biology learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2024). Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(3), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition (Complete E). Longman.

Barzilai, S., Mor-Hagani, S., Zohar, A. R., Shlomi-Elooz, T., & Ben-Yishai, R. (2020). Making sources visible: Promoting multiple document literacy with digital epistemic scaffolds. Computers & Education, 157, 103980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103980

Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.5477

Bermes, A. (2021). Information overload and fake news sharing: A transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102555

Buchan, M. C., Bhawra, J., & Katapally, T. R. (2024). Navigating the digital world: development of an evidence-based digital literacy program and assessment tool for youth. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00293-x

Deschênes, A.-A. (2024). Digital literacy, the use of collaborative technologies, and perceived social proximity in a hybrid work environment: Technology as a social binder. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100351

Ernest, I. Z., & Putra M, M. D. (2023). The Use of Google Sites-based Electronic Modules in Science Learning Against Digital Literacy of Junior High School Students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(2), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i2.56311

Fiorella, L. (2023). Making Sense of Generative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 35 (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7

Fisher, D., Frey, N., Hattie, J., & Thayre, M. (2017). Teaching Literacy in the Visible Learning Classroom, Grades 6-12. Corwin. https://www.corwin.com/books/lessons-for-visible-grades-6-12-249341

Fraillon, J. (2025). An International Perspective On Digital Literacy: Results from ICILS 2023. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87722-3

Gafur, I. A., Yustina, Suryawati, E., & Hadriana. (2024). Exploring Challenges in Understanding Abstract Biological Concepts: A Visual Literacy Perspective. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AICMSTE 2023). 234–245. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-216-3_25

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hinostroza, J. E., Armstrong-Gallegos, S., & Villafaena, M. (2024). Roles of digital technologies in the implementation of inquiry-based learning (IBL): A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100874. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100874

Jayanti, M. A. (2023). Developing an interactive e-module for digestive system materials to improve the analysis ability of high school students. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 7(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i1.48412

Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture – Media Education for the 21st Century (Part Two). Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2007-02-04

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Kominfo, B. (2023). Peluncuran hasil pengukuran Indeks Masyarakat Digital Indonesia (IMDI) tahun 2023. https://bpsdm.komdigi.go.id/berita-peluncuran-hasil-pengukuran-indeks-masyarakat-digital-indonesia-imdi-tahun--46-2092

Li, N., & Lau, K.-L. (2025). A two-staged SEM-ANN approach to predict learning presence in online foreign language education: The role of teaching presence and online interaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 66, 101012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101012

List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Analyzing and Integrating Models of Multiple Text Comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1328309

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I. D., Sari, T. M., Ismirawati, N. (2019). RICOSRE : A Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12227a

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Setiawan, D., Maghfiroh, H., & Muhaimin, F. G. (2022). Empowering College Students’ Problem-Solving Skills through RICOSRE. Education Sciences 12(3). 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030196

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 103711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711

McGrew, S., & Breakstone, J. (2023). Civic Online Reasoning Across the Curriculum: Developing and Testing the Efficacy of Digital Literacy Lessons. AERA Open, 9, 23328584231176452. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451

Nagel, M.-T., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2025). The competence to deal critically with online information among economics education students and teacher trainees in economics: implications for teacher training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 17(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-025-00186-4

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1

OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: CD Publishing. In OECD indicators. Paris: OE. OECD Publihing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.

OECD. (2021). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. In Education at a glance: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en.

Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., Korres, O., & Paños-Castro, J. (2023). Digital transformation in higher education: A qualitative evaluative study of a hybrid virtual format using a smart classroom system. Heliyon, 9(6), e16675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16675

Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 103859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859

Ramdani, D., Idaman, R. P., & Ali, M. (2025). Fostering 21-st century skills: The effectiveness of Ricosre and digital flipbooks in enhancing student collaboration in biology learning. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 18(2), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.59320

Schneeweiß, N., & Gropengießer, H. (2019). Organising levels of organisation for biology education: A systematic review of literature. Education Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030207

Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality . In Aslib Proceedings, 61(4). 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776

Thomann, H., & Deutscher, V. (2025). Scaffolding through prompts in digital learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness on learning achievement. Educational Research Review, 47, 100686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100686

Trixa, J., & Kaspar, K. (2024). Information literacy in the digital age: information sources, evaluation strategies, and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436

UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000265403

Vandermeulen, N., Van Steendam, E., De Maeyer, S., Lesterhuis, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2024). Learning to write syntheses: the effect of process feedback and of observing models on performance and process behaviors. Reading and Writing, 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10483-7

Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Gilissen, M. G. R., & Boersma, K. T. (2018). The Theoretical Nature of Systems Thinking. Perspectives on Systems Thinking in Biology Education. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00040

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2. The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Wineburg, Sam, & McGrew, Sarah. (2019). Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102

Wulandari, D. R., Sholihat, N., Purwanto, H., & Jehloh, N. (2024). Development Of Google Site As An Interactive Learning Media Integrated With Islamic Values. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 15(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosfer.v15i1.19424

Yuan, N., Yu, Q., & Liu, W. (2025). The impact of digital literacy on learning outcomes among college students: the mediating effect of digital atmosphere, self-efficacy for digital technology and digital learning. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1641687

Yusha, C. M., & Risnani, L. Y. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Digital Berbasis Google Sites pada Materi Sistem Pertahanan Tubuh Kelas XI: (Developing Digital Module Based Google Sites for Material Immune System for 11th Grade of Senior High School). BIODIK, 9(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v9i3.27678

Zhao, L., Liu, J., Karimov, A., & Saarela, M. (2025). Assessing and developing college students’ digital learning power: an empirical study based on questionnaire survey in a Chinese university. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00514-4

Zhou, X., Sun, K., Zhu, K., Feng, L., Sun, Q., & Zhong, D. (2025). The impact of digital literacy on university students’ innovation capability: evidence from Ningbo, China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548817