Science learning with a contextual approach based on local wisdom for to enhance elementary school students achievement

Rahman Rahman; Shirly Rizki Kusumaningrum; Mardhatillah Mardhatillah

doi:10.30862/jri.v6i1.59

Authors

Rahman Rahman Universitas Negeri Malang Author
Shirly Rizki Kusumaningrum Universitas Negeri Malang Author
Mardhatillah Mardhatillah Universitas Negeri Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v6i1.59

Keywords:

Contextual teaching and learning, learning achievement, elementary science

Abstract

Elementary science learning requires instructional approaches that enable students to connect scientific concepts with authentic experiences that are meaningful within their own cultural and environmental contexts. However, science instruction in many elementary classrooms remains predominantly teacher-centered, limiting students’ conceptual understanding and meaningful engagement with science. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) integrated with local wisdom and direct instruction in improving elementary students’ science learning achievement. A quasi-experimental study employing a posttest-only control group design was conducted with 60 fifth-grade students from SDN 020 Tana Tidung, Indonesia. The experimental group received CTL integrated with local wisdom, whereas the control group was taught using direct instruction. Students’ science learning achievement was measured using a 25-item multiple-choice test that demonstrated satisfactory content validity (Aiken’s V = 0.83) and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.87). Data were analyzed using an independent samples t-test following normality and homogeneity assumption testing. The results showed that the experimental group achieved a higher mean posttest score (82.00) than the control group (74.50), and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05). These findings indicate that integrating local wisdom into CTL provides a more meaningful learning environment by connecting scientific concepts with students’ everyday cultural and environmental experiences. This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting culturally responsive science education and suggests that integrating local wisdom into contextual learning can enhance elementary students’ science achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afolabi, F., & Akinbobola, A. O. (2021). Effects of contextualized teaching strategy on students’ achievement and attitude towards basic science. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14355a

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Aprilia, S., & Ratnasari, J. (2026). Integration of local wisdom in CTL learning to improve conceptual understanding of plant diversity in junior high school students. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v12i1.36559

Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2022). The effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning in enhancing students’ scientific literacy skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.12

Barrett, N., Hill, R., & Olds, A. (2025). Fidelity of implementation in educational interventions: Insights from computational thinking education. Computers in Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100265

Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 23(1), 1–12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed452376

Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational research, 53(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170219

Brondízio, E. S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ferrari, M. F., ... & Shrestha, U. B. (2021). Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 481-509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127

Brown, J. C. (2017). A metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry‐based science education in K‐12 settings: Implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1143–1173. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.21401

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.

Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Cramer, C., Little, M. E., & Stecker, P. (2021). Teacher commitment and fidelity of implementation: Predictors of student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1871598

Damopolii, I., Nunaki, J. H., Jeni, J., Rampheri, M. B., & Ambusaidi, K. A. (2024). An Integration of Local Wisdom into a Problem-based Student Book to Empower Students’ Conservation Attitudes. Participatory Educational Research, 11(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.10.11.1

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2023). Effective teacher professional development revisited: A review of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 567–606. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231123450

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26

Fitrianto, I., & Farisi, M. (2025). Integrating local wisdom into 21st century skills: A contextual framework for culturally relevant pedagogy in rural classrooms. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v3i2.444

Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Holden, J., & Martinenghi, M. (2025). Getting explicit instruction right. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10480

Irman, M., Budiarti, I. S., & Kusdianto, K. (2023). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPA berbasis kearifan lokal bakar batu Papua untuk siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Sains, 4(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v11i3.82417.

Jasper-Abowei, F. E., & Victor-Ishikaku, E. C. (2023). Contextual learning approach: A tool for enhancing critical thinking skills amongst learners’. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(5), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajssh.v4i5.762

Johnson, E. B. (2014). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.

Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Pedaste, M., Zacharia, Z. C., Juuti, K., Chen, Z., & Joolingen, W. (2024). Beyond inquiry or direct instruction: Pressing issues for science education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100541

Kadir, Z., Abdul, R. M. B., & Abdullah, N. (2023). Contextual learning and science concept mastery among primary school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.3

Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. M. (2022). The impact of contextual learning on students’ conceptual understanding: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12345–12367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11043-8

Kim, M., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Effects of explicit instruction on students’ science achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1876–1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2065950

Khusniati, M. (2017). Local Wisdom-Based Science Learning Model through Reconstruction of Indigenous Science to Improve Student’s Conservationist Character. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 16–23. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/158/1063

Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2025). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach. Routledge

Mason, L., Galloway, D., & Lee, J. (2021). Just how effective is Direct Instruction? A review of the evidence. Frontiers in Education, 6, 701432. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.701432

Melesse, D. (2025). Effect of context-based instructional approach on students’ acquisition of Integrated Science Process Skills (ISPS). Education Inquiry, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2025.2453256

Murfiah, U., & Ayuningtyas, T. (2024). Implementation of Social Studies Using Local Wisdom to Inform Learning as an Attempt to Strengthen Resilient Character in Elementary Students. Elementary School Forum (Mimbar Sekolah Dasar), 11(4), 773–787. 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i4.78859

Nasir, N. I. R. F., Mahanal, S., Ekawati, R., Damopolii, I., Supriyono, S., & Rahayuningsih, S. (2024). Primary school students’ knowledge about animal life cycle material: The survey study. Journal of Research in Instructional, 4(1), 253–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.320

Nawawi, M. (2025). Local wisdom-based science and environmental education management: perspectives from the Bunggu Indigenous community. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 408–418. 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11167

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Purwati, P., Marasabessy, F., & Damopolii, I. (2019). Enhancing students activity and problem solving skill through CTL-based local wisdom approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 032077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032077

Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching and teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800308

Shufa, N. K. F., & Adji, T. P. (2024). Integrating Local Wisdom in Independent Learning: Urgency and Innovative Strategies. PrimaryEdu: Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v8i2.4937

Silahooy, P. V., Nunaki, J. H., Jeni, J., Wambrauw, H. L., Nasir, N. I. R. F., Damopolii, I., Siregar, N. N., & Budirianto, H. J. (2024). Papuan local wisdom and problem-based learning: Integrated into student books and its effect on students’ conservation attitudes. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 4(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v4i1.568

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Hanley, P., & Thurston, A. (2014). Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs: A best‐evidence synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 870–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21139

Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C. , & Khoury, C. R. (2018). The effectiveness of Direct Instruction curricula: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919

Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and science education: Clarifying the debate on explicit versus inquiry instruction. Educational Research Review, 35, 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100552

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Wiyanto, W., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Saraswati, D. (2021). Integrating contextual learning to improve science achievement in primary school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31200